So you first complaint is outdated and petty, and the second is simply a question based on your ignorance as the site does value its content by making it easy to add new, while preserving the older ones in the gallery. This site uses one line of code as the difference, making it easier to update with new animations by simply changing one line of code per new page, or as individual animations are added. Website design is changing as search engines adapt to the massive amount of mobile users, so content per page can change, based on the results of the media device query. Why would you link to a site that may think so little of itself?Ī user is able to bookmark individual animations from this site, plus given the needs of todays websites to be responsive through media queries "one page" of animations may be different based on size of device. Some might say the site doesn't value its content enough to be able toīookmark a particular page of animations.
The home page has different coding, does that throw you into a desire to act like an idiot as well? Well if its a set of pages showing a smaller selection of a larger library the rather obvious answer to you idiotic question would be *content silly*, for the page has videos for you to select, check for yourself right mouse click on the outer gray bar of the page border, check source code, go to line 45 How does this differ from your link to page 2? _ylt=A86.ItIZnJRWYTAB1bybvZx4?p=NOAA+Environmental+Visualization+Lab&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-901&fp=1
0 kommentar(er)
